Saturday 30 April 2016

Valuation Of Immovable Property For Sale AndPurchase


 Valuation Of Immovable Property For Sale And Purchase


immovable property needs to be valued for sale and purchase to determine the price payable. Financial Institutions, Banks and moneylenders insist on valuation of immovable property to ascertain the margin available, worth of the security offered to Loans. It is a prerequisite for financing Home Loans. Generally the financial institutions or the housing finance companies get the property valued by their appointed approved values, while the tax authorities follow valuation as per tax laws and the land and building method.


Valuers are usually engineers or architects appointed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes under Section 3A of Wealth Tax Rules 1957. They are also members of the Institution of Valuers, which, incidentally, has a branch in Bangalore. These valuers do not have any personal interest in the properties, which they value.


There are various factors, both controllable and non-controllable, which affect the fair market valuation. Non-controllable factors are macro-economic conditions, political stability, government policy, and price index. Controllable factors are location, ondition of the property, its surroundings, reputation of the seller; whether the property is free hold or Lease hold, purpose for which the property can be used, whether the building byelaws are applicable, floor area ratio permitted, nature of the soil, size of the plot, occupant of the property, the shape of the property frontage available and nfrastructure available. With the vaastu being the rage of the day, the shape, road facing also play vital roles.


Any seller who is moderately intelligent and prudent, would not accept a price lesser than the market value. The same goes for any purchaser who would definitely not pay more than the market value at any given time. Thus, fair market value is the price, that a normal prudent willing owner/seller, not obliged to sell; may reasonably hope to get from a normal prudent and willing purchaser, with regard to its existing conditions, with all its merits and demerits, and its potential possibilities. It is to be noted that the fair market value of the same property keeps changing and valuation is relevant to the time of valuation. Various methods and techniques are adopted to value the property and arrive at a fair market value. They are as under:


This is most the frequently used method and is used by direct tax authorities with slight modification. The cost of the land is arrived by referring to the recent sales in the area. The cost of the construction of the building is arrived which is reduced by the permitted depreciation. Other infrastructural factors like availability of water, power connection and the relevant deposits are also considered. Some valuers consider the government rates fixed for the land instead of market value. Tax authorities follow this method by some modifications, wherein the cost of rebuilding the structure on the land less allowable depreciation is considered.


In this method, sales of the adjacent immovable properties having similar merits and demerits; with bonafide intentions; transactions between willing seller and willing purchasers are . considered. The proximate date of valuation and the date of sales are very important. Generally it is assumed that an actual transaction, with respect to specific property of recent date is a reasonable guide. Unregistered sale transactions and agreement to sell are not considered. All the available sales of adjacent immovable properties with the proximate dates are to be considered and one cannot pick and choose. This method is more convenient, reducing the element of speculation to minimum.


This is based on rental income of the property. In this method gross annual rental income of the property is arrived. From out of the gross rental income and the outgoings to maintain the building and statutory outgoings are deducted.The available net rent is multiplied by certain preconceived number of years. The multiplier factor is very important. In early part of 1950's, the multiplier factor was 20 years rent, having regard to the rate of interest on gilt-edged securities.

This was gradually changed in 1960 during which period the banks offered interest at the rate of 7 % to 10% and at present, the rate of interest is reduced on bank deposits as well as gilt edged securities. In certain cases the net rental value is multiplied by the remaining age of the building. This method suffers from certain limitations. The rent may be unreasonably high or unreasonably low. The property might have been let out long ago and rent might have remained unchanged for years. This method is more suitable in case of residential property where is the property is let out recently on prevailing rents / standard rent.


In this method, the value of the property is arrived by adopting different methods such as Land and Building Method, Rent Capitalization Method etc., and the average value of all these methods is arrived at.


This is akin to rent capitalization method. However, the Standard Rent under rent control act is used to arrive at the gross rent.


There are experts in valuation of immovable properties with necessary expertise on subject of valuation and have acquired sufficient practical experience in the field. They are capable of forming independent opinion. The expert must be given sufficient time to analyze the issue and arrive at the valuation of immovable property. The opinion of
the expert is admissible in evidence.


The person who owns property falling under Wealth Tax Act 1957 has to disclose the market value of the property and pay taxes accordingly. The disclosures made by the owner in his wealth tax returns should be a good indicator of the market value of the property. This market value is more relevant and finds favour with the government while compensating the owner on acquisition. However, the values disclosed in Wealth Tax Returns cannot be deciding or conclusive in determining the fair market value but throws some light on the issue.

For More...........:




Friday 29 April 2016

Scrutiny of Title Deeds



 Scrutiny of Title Deeds




Verification of title of the property is very important before entering into an agreement for purchase of any property. It is not merely tracing the title on the record but also examination of the genuineness of the records, identifica­tion of the property, notification in a newspaper and physical possession of the title of the property which involves scrutiny of title deeds. Clear and marketable title free from doubts and encumbrances with a right of physical possession of the vendor is a necessary ingredient for peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property by the purchaser.
Every purchaser having paid consider­able amount for purchase of immov­able property expects a perfect unencum­bered marketable title of the property purchased. But the seller cannot pass on a better title than what he has and all the defects in his title will also pass on to the purchaser. Many purchasers do not get the title of the seller verified by advo­cates who is having specialised knowl­edge and experience on property matters, often rely on real estate agents, middlemen and assurance of seller and seller's advocates legal opinion. Though they spend lakhs of rupees on purchase of property, they hesitate to spend a few thousand rupees on verification of title and later on land in trouble. Some of the reputed builders refuse to give title papers to the pur­chaser, dictate the terms and insist that property be purchased on their own. Advocates certify the title in just four lines without referring to the devolution of the property. The vendors / builders also force the purchaser to avail the loan from a particular new generation bank. Most of the times power of attorney is the only document which is handed over to the purchaser.


The   title   may  be   freehold  or leasehold. In case of freehold title, the owner has absolute title without any  encumbrance with power to alienate the property. But in case of leasehold the owner will be different who had leased the property to the Lessee for certain period and the rights are not absolute and the lessee will be only in possession of the property for agreed period. After the lapse of the agreed period, the lessee has to hand over the vacant possession to the owner. Such person may transfer only leasehold rights to the purchaser, if the lease document provides for alienation and the purchaser is bound by terms of lease deed. There are different forms of legal ownership of the property. Most common mode of ownership is individ­ual ownership where a single individual owns the property.   The following are different types of ownership:
1.    Government lands either Central or State.
2.                 Individual ownership.
3.                 Hindu undivided or joint family ownership of property.
4.    Property owned by a Private  Company or Public Company duly constituted under Indian Companies Act.
5.     Property ownership of a Government Company.
6.   Property ownership of a Co­operative society registered under Co-operative   Societies  Act   of respective stores.
7.    Property ownership of partner­ ship firms formed and registered under Indian Partnership Act.
8.    Wakf  proper­ties
9.   Trust properties including properties of temples and religious endowments.
10. Property ownership of public societies and clubs registered under societies Act.
11.  Property ownership of Autonomous Institutions (Statutory Bodies) like universities, electricity boards etc.
12.            Property ownership of Nationalised undertakings etc.
The first and foremost step in purchase of property is the scrutiny of title deeds before entering into an agreement with the seller / vendor. The ownership can be traced from the title deeds and the revenue records. Verification of title is very important.
Ascertainment of origin of the property, subsequent transfers, present status of the property are the three most important steps to be followed to trace the title of a property. For peaceful enjoyment of a property, apart from having possession, whether physical or constructive, clean and marketable title, free from all kinds of encumbrances is very important. There is no set yardstick to trace the title and it depends upon the diligence and application of mind of the advocate. As it is the duty and responsibility of the purchaser's advocate to safeguard the interest of his client, he shall have to thoroughly scrutinize the marketable title of the property and genuineness of the documents and advise his client about the risk, if any, involved in the transaction after such examination.


Ascertainment of the origin of the property is very important to trace the title of the property. It is otherwise called "Root of Title". The Vendor may have acquired the property by various modes such as Government Grant land, allotment made by the Government/Autonomous bodies/Housing Societies, by virtue of Will, sale, inheritance, etc. If the property is a Grant land or allotted by any authority, then the Grant Certificate or Allotment letter issued by the Competent Authority is necessary, apart from the other connected documents,  which  is considered as the origin of the property. In case of succession or transfer by way of Will, Sale, Gift, Exchange, Partition, Release, Settlement Deed or inheritance, we require documents of at least 42 years to be scrutinized and verified in a sequential order requiring methodical examination of all the events or transfers concerning the property. Documents covering a minimum period of 43 years of Adverse Possession against individu­als or Conflicting Claims (other than mortgage) against individuals and documents covering a minimum period of 30 years must be checked. If a person is enjoying the property for more than 30 years, he will get title by adverse interest against the government as per the Limitation Act. Also as per Section 90 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872, a document executed 30 years before is presumed to be valid.
Tracing of the title has to start by verification of the earliest document available, which is called parent deed or mother deed. If the earliest document is not available, the certified copy must be obtained at the Jurisdictional sub-registrar office. This earliest document details as to how the first owner got the property. Generally in earlier times, all the landed property was owned by Kings, Jodidars, Inamdars and they gifted or granted the land to the people. Such acquisition document generally will be by an Order of the Court, Government, Statutory Authority, ruler. Thereafter, the property might have passed through different hands who are referred to as intermediary parties. Such documents have to be examined in chronological order tracing the devolu­tion of property to each of the intermedi­ary parties. The sequence should be continuous without any break till the immediate transferor. In case of any missing link, the records at the sub registrar's office revenue department have to be verified to the satisfaction, but should not be ignored.
But documents like gift deed, partition deed, release deed, settlement deed are not mother documents and the title of the executants of such deeds has to be examined. After tracing the title of the property from the first owner to the immediate transferor, the latest docu­ment which describes how the present owner got the property has to be verified. Apart from legal documents like transfer deeds, the revenue records like tax paid receipts, Khatha, approved plans, encumbrance certificates, mutations, family tree and other records extracts have to be verified. The most important function of tracing the title is investiga­tion, where it is ascertained that records, documents produced actually exist are recorded in books, records of respective departments. But advocates certify the title with a narration "based on docu­ments produced" which does not refer to the investigation or genuineness of the documents. Often the advocates accept the latest documents without supporting documents and certify the title which is a dangerous practice.

For More...........:



Thursday 28 April 2016

Building Contract Agreements




It is the general practice that the Owner of a site, before initiating to construct a building over the property, hunt for a reputed and reliable contractor and after tracing the contractor, enters into an agreement which is commonly known as Building Contract Agreement.

Building contract is defined as an agreement under which a person, invariably a contractor undertakes for reward the carrying out for another person called the owner or employer, works of building of civil engineering character. In other words, Building contract agreements are agreements for construction of buildings and other structural work proposed to be constructed, which fall within the category of ordinary contracts and are governed by the provisions of Indian Contract Act including the basic rules as envisaged under the said Act such as, competency of the parties to the contract, consent, existence of consideration to the agreement and not against the public policy.


There are two methods which are generally used by the owners and the contractors as detailed below:

  1. Contract entered after inviting tenders: Under this method, the person who wants to construct a building invites tenders by advertising or issuing the Tender for 3 or more contractors and after choosing the best tender, accepts the tender amount with other terms and conditions. Acceptance by the owner of the property constitutes a valid contract. Subsequently, a formal agreement is entered into between the owner and the contractor. For constituting a valid building agreement by adopting the instant method, the agreement should contain all the necessary and mandatory terms and conditions, particulars of the work required to be done and the schedule of quantities and rates. This method of agreement is generally followed by the Government, Local authorities, Architects and other public corporations and trusts.
  2. Contract by directly executing agreement: Unlike in the former, in this mode of agreement, the owner and the contractor straight away negotiate and enter into a construction agreement and averments pertaining to the tenders cannot be looked into for evidence unless some ambiguity in the interpretation of recitals in the agreement exists. This method is generally adopted by commercial firms or individuals.
  3.  
  4. Format of the agreement: Generally the construction agreement that is available with the architect will be in the printed form wherein blanks are filled in by hand or some provisions are altered by hand, if necessary. In doing so, care has to be taken to see that there is no inconsistency between the written words or provisions and those remaining in print. In case of any inconsistency, the words incorporated in the blank prevails over the one already printed since the words filled in the blanks will articulate the intention of the parties.
  5. Appointment of an Architect: Irrespective of the magnitude of construction, once the hunt for an contractor is over, the immediate step to be taken by the owner is to appoint an Architect who is duly qualified. However, the owner and the architect have discretion to choose the mode for entering into the construction agreement. The architect prepares preliminary drawings and estimates and then prepares working drawings and specifications and bills of quantities and other documents relevant for the contract. It is also the general practice to appoint a clerk of works or resident engineer for carrying day to day supervision of the work and to see that the instructions of the Architect and structural engineer are complied with by the contractor.


Building contracts are generally of four types as listed below

Lump sum contract: In this type of contract, the contractor agrees to carry out the work for a fixed amount irrespective of anything else, which would be arrived at after mutual negotiations between the parties to the contract. It is not advisable to opt for this method since it may lead to lot of confusion.
Items rate contract: Under this category, work is divided into several items of work and the contractor quotes price of each item including the remuneration that will be paid in accordance with the work carried out at the rates agreed upon, which can be assessed with the help of a qualified Architect or a Civil Engineer.
Percentage contract: In this case, the contractor is paid certain percentage of amount on the total actual cost of the building as agreed earlier.
Cost plus percentage contract: In this category, the contractor gets the actual cost of work as well as certain percentage over and above the said cost which is accepted by the owner.

  • The general conditions in a building contract are
  • Description of the work to be executed.
  • Estimated quantities and rates payable.
  • Payment of earnest money and method of payment of running bills.
  • Time allowed for completion of the work.
  • Provision for extension of time.
  • Issuing interim and final certificate by the Architect.
  • Submission of the interim bills by the contractor and their payment.
  • Materials to be supplied by the owner.
  • Alterations, additions and omissions to be made if repaired according to the orders of the Engineer-in-charge.
  • Action and compensation payable in case of bad work.
  • Inspection of work.
  • Responsibility of the contractor for the acts done personally or through the agents authorized to undertake such acts.
  • Payment of damages or penalty in case of failure of the contractor to commence or to carry out the work according to the contract.
  • Liability of the contractor for compensation for delay in execution or completion of work.
  • Forfeiture of earnest money or security deposit.
  • Responsibility of the contractor to supply ladders, scaffoldings and other material required for construction.
  • Contractor's responsibility to remove condemned work or materials.
  • Giving of notices and payment of fees to local authorities.
  • Contractor's liability to pay statutory wages to workers.
  • Liability of the contractor to provide lights, fences and other precautions at the work site.
  • Liability of the contractor in case of breach of any of the terms and conditions envisaged in the contract, including payment of labour charges.
  • Who has to bear the expenses incurred for supply of Electricity, water supply required for execution of the work.
  • Adjudication of disputes pertaining to the contract either by referring to an Arbitrator or otherwise.
  • Liability of the contractor for workmen compensation in case of injury or death during the course of employment.


Role of an Architect

Architect plays a pivotal role in a building contract since the entire object of the contract to construct the building depends upon amount of commitment and diligence involved. Certain duties have been vested upon the architect such as:
To inspect the site of the proposed building and to advise the owner about its suitability.
To prepare plans, drawings, specifications and estimates.
Get the plans sanctioned by the local authorities.
Prepare tender or contract documents with all necessary conditions.
After acceptance of the tender and contract entered into, to supervise the work of the contract.
Bill Certification.

Apart from this, if there is any dispute regarding the construction then the Architect has to decide and give his decision by issuing a certificate to that effect. Further, the Architect has to administer and monitor day to day activities involved in the construction.

Appointment of Sub-Contractor

The contractor can appoint a Sub-Contractor for carrying out either for the whole work or part of the work, with or without the consent of the owner. However, if the consent of the owner is not obtained, Privity of contract between the owner and the Sub-Contractor does not exist unlike with the contractor personally appointed by the owner and in such case the contractor alone will be liable for all the acts done by the Sub-Contractor. Similarly the Sub-Contractor does not derive any right to raise claim against the owner pertaining to the construction contract.
Considering the present scenario where the cost involved for constructing a building is mounting and several instances where the construction project is left incomplete due to lack of co-ordination between the owner, contractor and the architect, it is advisable to enter into a construction agreement, after complying with all the mandatory requirements as envisaged under the statute and reduce the same in writing to manifest the specific duties and obligations vested on all the necessary parties. For successful completion of the construction project, it is necessary to incorporate all the terms & conditions of the contract explicitly.                   


For More...........:

Wednesday 27 April 2016

Selection of the Property

Selection of the Property


The registration has commenced pertaining to all the properties consequent to the relaxation of the ban imposed on the registration of certain properties. The ban on the registration has created an awareness in the public not to invest on the property which is improper.  On the other hand, the recent demolition drive undertaken by BMP in Koramangala has created a sense of fear among the public to invest on the property in and around Bangalore. Walking on the road involves risk; nevertheless we cannot sit at home. Likewise, investing in the property also involves certain risk, but we have to take certain calculative risks which will help us to live in a dream house and also appreciation on our investment.

Unknown Area:
No advocate can give clear cut assurance on the properties. There may be few transactions which cannot be traced from the documents produced for scrutiny, such as previous agreement entered into with somebody, pending court litigation between the family members or outsider, etc, which are the risky areas that cannot be traced by seeing the property documents. However, advertising public notice in the leading daily, having wide circulation in the area where the property is situated, will help to trace certain adverse claims, if any, before purchasing such property. However, such Public notice is only a precautionary measure and may not be binding on any one having interest in the property if the same is ignored or may have not seen the notice at all. If the same is noticed by anyone having any kind of interest over such property, then opportunity will be given to them to file the objection before the purchase of the property and subsequently, issues cropped pursuant to such objections could be sorted out by the Vendor. The purchaser can also back out from such transaction.

I herewith give certain guidelines as to where to invest and how to select the property in order to overcome any kind of ambiguity regarding purchase of any property.

Even though all the properties can be registered by the concerned Sub-Registrar, mere registration would not convey the title. Registering officer will act only in the ministerial capacity and do not have power to asses the Genuineness  and marketable title of the property. Infact, the Sub-Registrars are more concerned with the stamp duty and registration charges. No one can give better title than what they themselves have, is the basic principle of the Transfer of Property Act. A vendor having marketable title can lawfully convey the property and  register in the concerned Sub-Registrar in favour of the purchaser and if the vendor has defective title, conveying the same and getting it registered will not perfect his title as there will be a lot of confusion as to whether the property is legally valid or not.

Clear Marketable title
Before purchasing the property, marketable title, Genuineness of the document, enforceability of the title has to be scrutinized along with a thorough verification as to whether the relevant provision of the laws and other rules and regulations of the revenue authorities has been duly complied. Origin of the property, flow of the title and present status has to be verified with the help of an advocate, who is having experience on such matters.

B.D.A.Sites
Bangalore Development Authority, previously known as City Improvement Trust Board, allotted sites having the perfect title, compared with another title. BDA, being a statutory body, has got its own procedure envisaged in the BDA act in acquiring the lands from the private parties, formation of layouts along with all infrastructure like power, water and roads. Generally, impetus is given for providing civil amenities and width of the roads as per the town planning act. Layouts already developed has been provided with all the facilities immediately, for which we will have to pay moderate rate. Likewise, Co-operative societies layout, private layouts approved by BDA are governed by the rules and regulations of the BDA only. However, purchasing such property is advisable after scrutiny of the title thoroughly.

BMRDA Approved Sites
Recently, lot of layouts approved by BMRDA i.e., Anekal Planning Authority(APA), Nelamangal Planning Authority(NPA), Magadi Planning Authority (MPA), Hosakote Planning Authority(HPA), Kanakapura Planning Authority(HPA), Bangalore International Airport Area Planning Authority [BIAAPA] are coming up in the outskirts of Bangalore, with  proper planning and development.  This is due to the recent ban on registration of such properties without BMRDA Release Letter.
Recently, BMRDA has changed its rules and regulations, wherein only 60% of the sites would be released at the time of approving layout plan, while remaining 40% of the sites will be released after completion of the entire layout.

Accordingly, the Sub-Registrar refuses to register such sites without the release letter. So it became mandatory on the part of the developers to develop the entire layout and get the release order of the balance 40% of the sites. After the relaxation of the ban on registration, Sub-Registrar is registering BMRDA sites without release order, which, infact has affected the developmental activities of such layouts.

Few of the promoters are selling the sites without providing basic facilities with an assurance to develop the same, but fail to do the same.


The government has to take initiative and should make it mandatory to submit order of release of sites at the time of registering BMRDA approved sites, in order to safeguard the interest of such purchasers.

For More...........: